Although the president of the employers has already made it clear: “The Government should have the decency not to legislate before the elections.” But Minister Valerio said the opposite. “This government has never shaken its legs to take positive measures for the citizenship of this country. They have not shaken us, nor will they shake us, “he added. He explained that the Executive is very clear about what to do in the labor market before the end of the legislature. What changes does the Government intend to make? One of the star measures is to end the role of the company agreement. This will allow that what was agreed by unions and employers on wages and working days in 2019 calendar Rahu Kalam agreements -state, regional or provincial- again be above what is agreed within the companies. They will kill two birds with one stone. On the one hand, the lost role of the unions in the companies would be restored and, on the other, the wage cuts that implied in 2012 giving full power to the companies in the agreements would be restrained.
2019 calendar Rahu Kalam
Sánchez also wants to recover the subsidy at age 52 and establish mandatory retirement clauses in the agreements related to employment processes and generational change. His idea is also to limit the “departures” for very specific cases, “real need” and eliminate the current limit of one year for ultraactivity and collective bargaining to determine its duration.
Spending on pensions continues to escalate and the deficit gives no respite to public accounts, but the agreement in the Toledo Pact will have to wait; There seems to be no hurry. Their 2019 calendar Rahu Kalam lordships have been stripping the daisy for two years in search of a consensus that allows the public pension system to be sustained, but they are incapable of understanding each other. They have done it only once and the only measure adopted has been more expense. Since 2018, the revaluation of the payroll of retirees has been linked to the CPI with the approval of all the parliamentary groups, although with the vote in vote of national and international organizations.